|
Post by J. T./Jessica on May 13, 2007 19:43:31 GMT -5
...Daniel, read Stupid News...
|
|
|
Post by Enigma! on Jun 8, 2007 23:56:18 GMT -5
Fairy tales are very dark and creepy. But Disney kiddified most of them so much that we forget these things.
For example: in Little Red Riding Hood, after the wolf eats Grandma and dresses as her, he invites Red to lay in bed with him and drink wine, that was really Grandma's blood poured into a wine bottle. The story was originally a metaphor for how the British treated the French. But that scene is all but forgotten.
Is this for the better?
|
|
|
Post by J. T./Jessica on Jun 9, 2007 8:52:40 GMT -5
No, because it causes kids to grow up thinking everything is nice and rosy and everything will always turn out good in the end...
And so they're REALLY not prepared when Real Life hits them in the face like a brick.
|
|
|
Post by J. T./Jessica on Nov 7, 2007 15:58:36 GMT -5
I agree wholeheartedly.
|
|
|
Post by J. T./Jessica on Dec 16, 2007 22:39:21 GMT -5
Huh...
We're at my mother's at the moment. She happens to be watching Yet Another Christmas Carol Remake. (Earlier, when it talks about the three spirits, I joked about requesting Jack Daniels, Foster's and Heinekin, but that's beside the point...)
The point is thus; At the end of The Christmas Carol, Scrooge (in whatever form the character takes in the version being read or viewed) changes his (or her) ways... not out of a heartfelt desire to be a good person, but rather out of a fear of the consequences of what might happen if they don't. Basically saying that it's better to do good out of fear than to do good for good's sake. For all that Scrooge is shown throughout the night, he remains the same - self-serving and self-focused. The only difference is that the focus is no longer on gathering wealth to him, but rather on saving his own skin.
|
|
|
Post by J. T./Jessica on Dec 16, 2007 22:45:48 GMT -5
Another thing - this cruel, heartless person is suddenly acting like everyone's best friend and NO ONE is suspious about it?
|
|
|
Post by BloodAngel on Dec 17, 2007 14:04:14 GMT -5
I think it's more it's just better to be or do good, regarless of the reason why.
|
|
|
Post by J. T./Jessica on Dec 17, 2007 18:04:57 GMT -5
Which leads to a question of "Calvin and Hobbes" proportions...
|
|
|
Post by BloodAngel on Dec 24, 2007 7:24:33 GMT -5
The point is thus; At the end of The Christmas Carol, Scrooge (in whatever form the character takes in the version being read or viewed) changes his (or her) ways... not out of a heartfelt desire to be a good person, but rather out of a fear of the consequences of what might happen if they don't. Basically saying that it's better to do good out of fear than to do good for good's sake. For all that Scrooge is shown throughout the night, he remains the same - self-serving and self-focused. The only difference is that the focus is no longer on gathering wealth to him, but rather on saving his own skin. In watching Muppet Christmas Carol (One of the most faithful adaptations), I had a thought. Scrooge seems like he's willing to change about halfway through Ghost of Christmas Present, which was non-threatening and happy. Especially after seeing Tiny Tim. Maybe the Ghost of Christmas Yet to Come only cemented his decision? And as for the second point you brought up... would you, if you were someone working for a charitable orginization and you recived money from that guy ask why? It's likely a case of "Don't look a gift horse in the mouth".
|
|
|
Post by BloodAngel on Mar 20, 2008 3:27:41 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by J. T./Jessica on Mar 21, 2008 13:43:49 GMT -5
Makes sense to me.
Were you doing only guys, because there is always Kodachi "The Black Rose" Kuno...
But it could be worse - I got bored the other night and came up with a theory as to why Gulliman and the 'Chapterist' Primarchs were traitors and Rogel Dorn and the 'Legionnaire' Primarchs were more loyal to the Emperor's idea of the Space Marines after his death and the Horus Heresy...
|
|
|
Post by BloodAngel on Mar 21, 2008 17:44:25 GMT -5
I knew I'd forgotten someone else.
|
|
|
Post by J. T./Jessica on Mar 22, 2008 8:26:32 GMT -5
Thinking about it, only the cherry blossom gets used more as symbolism in anime...
|
|
|
Post by J. T./Jessica on Oct 7, 2008 0:11:16 GMT -5
Interesting thought...
As we all know, Jay and Silent Bob deal drugs - right?
How honest do you think they are/were/whatever as dealers? I mean, do they sell the good stuff, high quality dope - or do they cut coke with baking soda, mix oregano with grass, etc. to cut corners and increase profits?
|
|
|
Post by J. T./Jessica on Oct 13, 2008 15:24:41 GMT -5
Hm...
Something I realized today going through my old VHS tapes and packing them away - Half of the Disney movies seem to involve a carefree character (usually male) getting 'domesticated' by a well-bred character (usually female)
Think about it; Lady and the Tramp - female pet ends up with a male stray who is, in the end, taken in by her humans and becomes a pet himself.
Aristocats - O'Malley ends up becoming a housecat when Duchess' owner decides to turn her house into a home for all the alley cats of Paris, starting with O'Malley, Hepcat and his band.
Robin Hood - we all know this one.
The Jungle Book - in the end, jungle-raised Mowgli joins a human village... why? because he was following a girl.
The Little Mermaid (not sure if it completely counts since Eric didn't seem to act proper all the time) - Ariel is anything but proper, but marries the Prince.
Beauty and the Beast (Again, not sure if it counts completely since the Beast was anything BUT proper, but he was a nobleman...) - Belle isn't a 'proper' young lady, but ends up marrying a lord.
Aladdin (and sequels) - Street Rat straightens up because of a Princess.
Mulan (again, questionably because of Shang's attitude) - Disobedient daughter saves China and marries her commanding officer (with the Emperor's blessing...)
Tarzan - like "Jungle Book", Tarzan is raised in the jungle and changes because of a 'proper' British lady.
And that's not counting Cars, which is a Disney-Pixar film.
It's more or less traditional for children to watch Disney movies growing up, right? Counting sequels, that's almost twenty different movies with the same base concept - "Conformity bring Happiness" - is it just me, or does that thought creep anyone else here out?
|
|